Band 7.5 In many cities, traffic congestion is a serious problem. What are the causes of this issue, and what measures could be taken to solve it? Solved
User Stance
In many cities, traffic congestion is a serious problem. What are the causes of this issue, and what measures could be taken to solve it?
Anyone who’s sat in a city traffic jam knows it’s a right nightmare horns blaring, tempers flaring. Congestion’s a growing headache in urban areas, driven by too many cars and dodgy planning. This essay digs into why it happens and tosses out some fixes that might actually work.
One big cause is the sheer number of vehicles. Everyone’s got a car these days—or wants one. In my city, roads built for horse carts now choke under rush-hour madness. Families often have two or three motors, clogging streets cos public transport’s slow or packed. It’s a vicious cycle—more cars, worse delays, linking back to folks ditching buses for their own wheels.
Another key point is poor infrastructure. Narrow roads, badly timed lights, and not enough bridges muck things up. Take London my mate there says roadworks drag on forever, bottling traffic even more. Some might argue it’s down to population growth, which is fair, but shoddy planning amplifies it. Funny how cities sprout skyscrapers yet forget wider lanes.
So, what’s the fix? First, beef up public transport. Cheap, fast trains or buses could lure drivers off roads. In my country, a new metro line slashed car use in months. Another move is congestion charges slap a fee on city-centre driving. It worked in Singapore; streets cleared up quick. Carpool lanes could help too, though convincing folks to share rides is tricky.
In wrapping up, too many cars and rubbish planning fuel traffic chaos, but better transport and smart fees can ease it. It’s grim watching cities grind to a halt time we sorted this mess out.
9 errors detected: 1 punctuation, 8 informality issues.
In-depth Feedback
The essay effectively addresses the causes of traffic congestion and proposes viable solutions, maintaining strong relevance to the question. The ideas are clear and well-developed, supported by specific examples like the impact of public transport improvements and congestion charges. The essay exceeds the minimum word count, ensuring a complete response. Coherence and cohesion are strong, with logical progression and effective use of linking words. Lexical resource is varied, though some colloquialisms ('dodgy planning', 'rubbish planning') slightly detract from formality. Grammatical accuracy is good, with minor errors that do not impede understanding. Overall, this is a well-structured and relevant response.
Detailed Recommendations
The essay fully addresses the causes and solutions of traffic congestion, providing clear and relevant ideas. Examples like the new metro line and congestion charges in Singapore effectively support the arguments. The word count is sufficient, ensuring a complete response. Minor improvements could include more formal language and additional specific data to strengthen the examples.
The essay demonstrates a logical structure with clear progression from causes to solutions. The introduction and conclusion are effective, and linking words are used accurately. There is a good variety of connectors, though some transitions could be smoother. Overall, the essay flows well and is easy to follow.
The essay uses a varied vocabulary, though some colloquialisms ('dodgy planning', 'rubbish planning') reduce formality. Spelling is accurate, and collocations are generally natural. To achieve a higher score, aim for more sophisticated and precise vocabulary.
The essay displays a variety of sentence structures, though some errors are present. Complex sentences are used effectively, but minor grammatical mistakes occur. Accuracy is generally good, with errors that do not significantly hinder understanding.
Grammatical Errors
Error: "roads built for horse carts now choke under rush-hour madness"
Explanation: Subject-verb agreement issue
Correction: "roads built for horse carts now choke under rush-hour traffic"
-
Task Achievement:
-
Coherence & Cohesion:
-
Lexical Resource:
-
Grammatical Range:
Task Achievement
Addresses The Task Fully: 9
Offers Clear, Developed Ideas: 8
Provides Relevant, Specific Support: 8
Fits Appropriate Length: 9
Coherence & Cohesion
Progresses Ideas Logically: 8
Clear Intro & Conclusion: 9
Uses Cohesive Devices Well: 8
Varies Cohesive Devices: 7
Lexical Resource
Varied Vocabulary: 7
Accurate Spelling & Formation: 9
Collocations: 7
Grammatical Range
Mixes Simple & Complex Forms: 7
Accurate Grammar: 7