Band 7.5 Nowadays, many people move to other countries to live and work. Why do people choose to do this? Is it a positive or negative development? Solved
User Stance
Nowadays, many people move to other countries to live and work. Why do people choose to do this? Is it a positive or negative development?
These days, it’s become increasingly common for people to pack up their lives and relocate to foreign countries. Whether it’s for better job prospects, education, or simply a change of scenery, the reasons are as varied as the individuals themselves. But what drives this trend, and is it ultimately beneficial? While some argue it fosters cultural exchange and economic growth, others worry about brain drain and social fragmentation. This essay will explore the motivations behind migration and weigh its pros and cons.
One major pull factor is economic opportunity. Many countries, especially developed ones, offer higher wages and better working conditions than one’s homeland. Take, for instance, the influx of skilled workers from South Asia to the Gulf nations—where salaries in sectors like engineering or healthcare can be exponentially higher. On top of that, access to advanced infrastructure and career growth often makes the move worthwhile.
That said, it’s not just about money. Quality of life plays a huge role too. In my country, overcrowding and pollution push many to seek cleaner, more organised cities abroad. Countries like Canada or Australia, with their emphasis on work-life balance and public welfare, understandably attract migrants.
Is this a positive development? To a great extent, yes. Migrants contribute to their host nations’ economies while sending remittances home, which can uplift entire communities. However, the flip side is the risk of talent depletion in their home countries, not to mention the challenges of integration abroad.
All things considered, global mobility is a double-edged sword—it brings undeniable benefits but requires careful management to mitigate downsides. Perhaps the key lies in policies that ensure mutual gain for both migrants and their home and host nations.
4 informality errors detected.
In-depth Feedback
The essay effectively addresses the question's focus on the reasons for migration and its positive or negative impacts. It provides a balanced view, discussing economic opportunities and quality of life as key motivators, while also acknowledging potential drawbacks like brain drain and social challenges. The argument is well-developed with specific examples, such as skilled workers moving to Gulf nations and the appeal of countries like Canada and Australia. The conclusion thoughtfully summarizes the dual nature of migration, suggesting the need for balanced policies. Overall, the essay is relevant, coherent, and well-supported, though it could benefit from more nuanced vocabulary and slightly more complex sentence structures to elevate its sophistication.
Detailed Recommendations
The essay fully addresses the question's focus on why people migrate and whether it is a positive or negative development. It provides clear, well-developed ideas with relevant examples, such as economic opportunities in Gulf nations and quality of life in Canada and Australia. The argument is balanced, discussing both benefits and drawbacks, and meets the word count requirement. Minor improvements could include more specific data or studies to strengthen the examples further.
The essay has a strong logical structure with clear progression from reasons for migration to its impacts. The introduction and conclusion are effective, framing the discussion well. Linking words are used accurately, though there is room for greater variety in transitions. The flow is seamless, with minor lapses where additional connectors could enhance coherence further.
The vocabulary is adequate and generally precise, with some effective phrasing (e.g., 'double-edged sword'). However, there is occasional repetition (e.g., 'economic opportunity' and 'quality of life' are used multiple times), and the range could be broader. Collocations are mostly natural, though a few phrases could be more idiomatic. Spelling is error-free.
The essay demonstrates a good mix of simple and complex sentence structures, though there is room for more variety in complex constructions. Grammar is mostly accurate, with only minor errors that do not impede understanding. The essay would benefit from more sophisticated grammatical structures to elevate its overall quality.
Grammatical Errors
No grammatical errors detected.
-
Task Achievement:
-
Coherence & Cohesion:
-
Lexical Resource:
-
Grammatical Range:
Task Achievement
Addresses The Task Fully: 9
Offers Clear, Developed Ideas: 8
Provides Relevant, Specific Support: 8
Fits Appropriate Length: 9
Coherence & Cohesion
Progresses Ideas Logically: 8
Clear Intro & Conclusion: 9
Uses Cohesive Devices Well: 7
Varies Cohesive Devices: 7
Lexical Resource
Varied Vocabulary: 7
Accurate Spelling & Formation: 9
Collocations: 7
Grammatical Range
Mixes Simple & Complex Forms: 7
Accurate Grammar: 8