Band 7.5 Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down. Others believe that zoos are useful for protecting rare animals. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Solved
User Stance
Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down. Others believe that zoos are useful for protecting rare animals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Zoos have long sparked debate—some label them as cruel relics that should vanish, while others champion their role in safeguarding endangered species. Both perspectives carry weight, and exploring them reveals a complex issue worth pondering.
Critics argue that zoos inflict suffering. Animals, stripped of their natural habitats, are confined to artificial enclosures—think of a tiger pacing a concrete pen instead of prowling vast grasslands. This captivity often breeds stress or abnormal behaviour, hardly a life worth living. Moreover, many zoos prioritise profit over welfare, turning creatures into spectacles for ticket sales. I’ve seen parrots crammed into tiny cages near my city, their vibrant wings clipped, and it’s hard to justify that as care.
Conversely, proponents highlight zoos’ conservation value. Rare species—like the Amur leopard or Indian rhinoceros—face extinction from poaching or habitat loss, and zoos offer a lifeline through breeding programs. Beyond survival, they educate the public; a child’s awe at an elephant can ignite lifelong environmental passion. Research conducted in zoos also aids wild populations—think of genetic studies saving a dying breed. My visit to a sanctuary-style zoo showed me how such efforts can work when done right.
In my opinion, the solution lies in reform, not abolition. Zoos must evolve—larger, naturalistic habitats and a focus on conservation over commerce could align them with ethical standards. While cruelty is indefensible, the loss of species is a greater tragedy. Well-run zoos can bridge that gap. What’s your stance?
In-depth Feedback
The essay effectively discusses both views on zoos and provides a clear opinion, addressing the question's focus comprehensively. It is well-structured, with relevant examples and a balanced argument.
Detailed Recommendations
The essay fully addresses both views and gives a clear opinion, with relevant examples.
The essay is well-organized with clear progression and effective linking words.
The vocabulary is varied and mostly precise, with some strong collocations.
The essay demonstrates a good range of structures with minor errors.
Grammatical Errors
Error: "This captivity often breeds stress or abnormal behaviour, hardly a life worth living."
Explanation: Missing comma after 'behaviour' for clarity.
Correction: "This captivity often breeds stress or abnormal behaviour, hardly a life worth living."
-
Task Achievement:
-
Coherence & Cohesion:
-
Lexical Resource:
-
Grammatical Range:
Task Achievement
Addresses The Task Fully: 9
Offers Clear, Developed Ideas: 8
Provides Relevant, Specific Support: 8
Fits Appropriate Length: 8
Coherence & Cohesion
Progresses Ideas Logically: 8
Clear Intro & Conclusion: 9
Uses Cohesive Devices Well: 8
Varies Cohesive Devices: 7
Lexical Resource
Varied Vocabulary: 7
Accurate Spelling & Formation: 9
Collocations: 7
Grammatical Range
Mixes Simple & Complex Forms: 7
Accurate Grammar: 7